<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Game Manifesto</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gamemanifesto.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gamemanifesto.com</link>
	<description>Games, applied to the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 23:23:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Game, The Definition by Mircea</title>
		<link>http://gamemanifesto.com/2010/game-the-definition/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Mircea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 23:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamemanifesto.com/?p=42#comment-7</guid>
		<description>The games function is learning because we have the possibility to interact directly with the product (game). Yes, it&#039;s a guided interaction (pre-programmed) for most of the part but it&#039;s still an interaction.

You can interact with a movie or a song only at the mental level, by feelings. There&#039;s no physical interaction, like it happens in games (by using some tool and actually see the physical result of your interaction - even if it&#039;s on screen only).

Maybe that&#039;s what made the game industry become bigger than movie industry...people wanted more than just stare at the screen...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The games function is learning because we have the possibility to interact directly with the product (game). Yes, it&#8217;s a guided interaction (pre-programmed) for most of the part but it&#8217;s still an interaction.</p>
<p>You can interact with a movie or a song only at the mental level, by feelings. There&#8217;s no physical interaction, like it happens in games (by using some tool and actually see the physical result of your interaction &#8211; even if it&#8217;s on screen only).</p>
<p>Maybe that&#8217;s what made the game industry become bigger than movie industry&#8230;people wanted more than just stare at the screen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tech Risk Management by Dominic Cerisano</title>
		<link>http://gamemanifesto.com/2010/tech-risk-management/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Cerisano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anatolie.us/?p=3#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I have participated in Risk Assessments. Could you give examples of questions/criteria that appear in these?

Its one thing to define the various levels of project risk, but quite another to actually make the determination of where given project component resides.

Could you also speak to risk mitigation techniques? (eg. Bow-Tie, etc)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have participated in Risk Assessments. Could you give examples of questions/criteria that appear in these?</p>
<p>Its one thing to define the various levels of project risk, but quite another to actually make the determination of where given project component resides.</p>
<p>Could you also speak to risk mitigation techniques? (eg. Bow-Tie, etc)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on People Behind Tech by Dominic Cerisano</title>
		<link>http://gamemanifesto.com/2010/people-behind-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Cerisano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anatolie.us/?p=24#comment-5</guid>
		<description>A Bob-Maiden&#039;s Tale

I agree with your analysis, and would even extend it by stating that ideas/tech are like children. 

Originating ideas and prototypes are oft referred to as &quot;seminal works&quot;. These works, once incubated, start developing into full grown technologies (children)

&quot;That&#039;s Bob&#039;s baby&quot; is heard in many inception phase environments. It&#039;s mostly inside him, and begins to emerge as Bob goes into the labor phase.

You can&#039;t steal a baby while still in the womb - unless Bob is a surrogate mother (Hand-Maiden/out-source labor). A surrogate Bob-Maiden could indeed run away while still in labor. Happens all the time.

A natural mother cannot steal her own baby.

So the dangers of outsourced development are similar to surrogate births. Even their raison-d&#039;etres are the same: the baby has no natural mother (Bob-Maiden).

&quot;Whoa!&quot; you might say. &quot;Are you stating that tech development is outsourced because there is no local labor force?&quot;

Labor there is, but obviously not in any kind of force.

Why would a natural mother who is fertile allow a surrogate birth (Hand Maiden)? Vanity, perhaps but what kind of mother would that be?

Are local developers so vain that they permit outsourcing simply because they don&#039;t want to get their hands dirty?

Bob-mother has as much choice in the matter as a natural mother. Bob is capable of labor and should engage in seminal works if he so chooses. Bob-mother&#039;s wishes transcend any rational for a Bob-Maiden.

Here is the big creepy - Globalization is turning all developers into Bob-Maidens. They conceive the ideas, develop the tech and then it is whisked away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Bob-Maiden&#8217;s Tale</p>
<p>I agree with your analysis, and would even extend it by stating that ideas/tech are like children. </p>
<p>Originating ideas and prototypes are oft referred to as &#8220;seminal works&#8221;. These works, once incubated, start developing into full grown technologies (children)</p>
<p>&#8220;That&#8217;s Bob&#8217;s baby&#8221; is heard in many inception phase environments. It&#8217;s mostly inside him, and begins to emerge as Bob goes into the labor phase.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t steal a baby while still in the womb &#8211; unless Bob is a surrogate mother (Hand-Maiden/out-source labor). A surrogate Bob-Maiden could indeed run away while still in labor. Happens all the time.</p>
<p>A natural mother cannot steal her own baby.</p>
<p>So the dangers of outsourced development are similar to surrogate births. Even their raison-d&#8217;etres are the same: the baby has no natural mother (Bob-Maiden).</p>
<p>&#8220;Whoa!&#8221; you might say. &#8220;Are you stating that tech development is outsourced because there is no local labor force?&#8221;</p>
<p>Labor there is, but obviously not in any kind of force.</p>
<p>Why would a natural mother who is fertile allow a surrogate birth (Hand Maiden)? Vanity, perhaps but what kind of mother would that be?</p>
<p>Are local developers so vain that they permit outsourcing simply because they don&#8217;t want to get their hands dirty?</p>
<p>Bob-mother has as much choice in the matter as a natural mother. Bob is capable of labor and should engage in seminal works if he so chooses. Bob-mother&#8217;s wishes transcend any rational for a Bob-Maiden.</p>
<p>Here is the big creepy &#8211; Globalization is turning all developers into Bob-Maidens. They conceive the ideas, develop the tech and then it is whisked away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Social Games Classification by Mircea @ MyTestBox.com</title>
		<link>http://gamemanifesto.com/2010/game-meta-classification/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Mircea @ MyTestBox.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 23:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anatolie.us/?p=28#comment-4</guid>
		<description>But are you up to this challenge ;)? I know you are!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But are you up to this challenge <img src='http://gamemanifesto.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> ? I know you are!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

